PREPARE PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS TO FACE THE TECHNOLOGICAL AGE: MATHEMATICAL CREATIVITY AND SPATIAL ABILITY

Minanur Rohman(1),
(1) Department of Mathematics, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2019 journal AL-MUDARRIS

: https://doi.org/10.32478/al-mudarris.v2i1.237

Full Text:    /  Language : en
Submitted : 2019-03-29
Published : 2019-04-30

Abstract


Technology and mathematics are two things that are interconnected and influence. Technology, such as computer games, can be used to describe abstract mathematical concepts so that they are more easily understood by students. Unfortunately, technology also has some undesirable impacts, such as causing students difficulties in developing their creativity to understand mathematical concepts. On the other hand, spatial ability gets less attention than educators when students are studying mathematics. This paper will discuss how teachers can help students develop their mathematical creativity and spatial ability.

Keywords


Technology, mathematical creativity, and spatial ability.

References


Beghetto, R, A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom context for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1). 53-69.

Bishara, S. (2016). Creativity in unique problem-solving in mathematics and its influence on motivation for learning. Cogent Education. 3. 1-14.

Bolden, D. S., Harries, T. V., & Newton, D. P. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ conception of creativity in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 73. 143-157.

Bornstein, M. H. (2011). The mind of preschool child: The intelligence-school interface. In O. A. Barbarin & B. H. Wasik. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Development and Early Education: Research to Practice (pp. 123-142). New York: Guilford Press.

Bronson, P. O., & Merryman, A. (2010, July 19). The creativity crisis. Newsweek, pp. 44-50.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and posperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.

Craft, A. (2011). Creativity and education futures: Learning in digital age. England: Trentham Books.

Desli, D., & Zioga, M. (2015). Looking for creativity in primary school mathematical tasks. Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Prague, Czech Republic.

De Smedt, B., Janssen, R., Bouwens, K., Verschaffel, L., Boets B., & Ghesquiere, P. (2009). Working memory and individual differences in mathematical achievement: A longitudinal study from first grade to second grade. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 103. 186-201.

Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization. Retrieved on February 12 2019 from http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academics/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf.

Gravemeijer, K., Stephen, M., Julie, C., Lin, F-F., Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society and student. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15(1). 105-123.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist. 5. 444-454.

Hakim, G., & Gazit, E. (2011). The role of creativity in solving unique problems in series with students-Seventh compared mathematics teachers in elementary school, and students teachers to other fields of knowledge. Strong Number 2000. 20. 40-48.

Haavold, P. O. (2013). What are the characteristic of mathematical creativity? An empirical and theoretical investigation of mathematical creativity (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://munin.uit.no.

Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence. 32. 24-34.

Kajander, A. (1990). Measuring mathematical aptitude in exploratory computer environments. Roeper Review. 25(4). 62-65.

Kattou, M., Kontoyianni, K., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2013). Connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability. ZDM Mathematics Education. 45. 167-181.

Keeler, S. P., & Grandine, T. A. (2013). Getting math off the ground. In A. Damlain, J. Rodrigues & R. Strasser (Eds). Educational interfaces between mathematics and industry. Report on an ICMI-ICAM Study. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Leikin, R., & Sriraman, B. (2017). Creativity and Giftedness. Interdisciplinary perspective from mathematics and beyond. Basel: Springer International Publishing.

Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2012). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pers.

Lin, C. H., & Chen, C. M. (2016). Developing spatial visualization and mental rotation with a digital puzzle game at primary school level. Computers in Human Behavior. 57. 23-30.

Lin, C. H., & Liu, E. Z. F. (2009). A comparison between drill-based and game-based typing software. In Transactions on Education III, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 5940, pp. 48-58)

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development. 56(6). 1479-1498.

Mann, E. (2005). Mathematical Creativity and School Mathematics: Indicators of Mathematical creativity in Middle School Students. Doctoral dissertation.

Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y. -L. (2012). The relation between space and math. In J. B. Benson (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (42) (pp.197-243). New York: Elsevier.

Moe, A. (2018). Mental rotation and mathematics: Gender-stereotype beliefs and relationships in primary school children. Learning and Individual Differences. 61. 172-180.

Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Seeing relationship: using spatial thinking to teach science, mathematics, and social science. American Educator. 37. 26-31 and 40.

Papastergiou, M. (2009). Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: a literature review. Computers and Education. 43(3). 603-622.

Plucker, J. & Baghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Stenberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer. (Eds.), Creativity from potential to realization (pp. 153-168). Washington, DC: American psychological association.

Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., Hecht, S. A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual differences, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences. 20. 110-122.

Rasmussen, C., & Bisanz, J. (2005). Representation and working memory in early arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 91. 137-157.

Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Gender differences in spatial ability: implications for STEM education and approaches to reducing the gap for parents and educators. In M. S. Khine (Eds.). Visual-spatial Ability in STEM Education (pp. 195-224). Southporth: Springer International Publishing.

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 24(1). 92-96.

Schoevers,. E. M., Kattou, M., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2018). Mathematical creativity: A combination of domain-general creative and domain-specific mathematical skills. Journal of Creative Behavior. 0(0). 1-11.

Schoevers, E. M., Lesemen, P. P. M., Slot, E. M., Bakker, A., Keijzer, R., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2019). Promoting pupils’ creativity thinking in primary school mathematics: A case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 31. 323-334.

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US patent office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implication. Creativity Research Journal. 24. 97-106.

Siraraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20-36.

Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science: a critical review. American Psychologist. 60(9). 950-958.

Sung, E. (2017). The influence of visualization tendency on problem-solving ability and learning achievement of primary school students in South Korea. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 26. 168-175.

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Lee, M. D. (2008). Designing multimedia games for young children’s taxonomic concept development. Computer and Education. 50. 1037-1051.

Usiskin, Z. (2000). The development into mathematical talented. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. 11(3). 152-162.

Uttal, D. H., Meadow., N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training students. Psychology Bulettin. 139(2). 352-402.

Veldhuis, M. & Zhao, X. (2018). The effectiveness of mathematics teaching in primary schools. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(2), 200-204.

Ven, S. H. G. van der., Maas, H. L. J. van der., Straatmeier, M., Jansen, B. R. J. (2013). Visuospatial working memory and mathematical ability at different ages throughout primary school. Learning and Individual Differences. 27. 182-192.

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology. 101(4). 817-835.

Yeo, K. K. (2009). Secondary 2 students’ difficulties in solving non-routine problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. 10. 1-30.

Zhang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Does growth rate in spatial ability matter in predicting early arithmetic competence?. Learning and Instruction, 49. 232-241.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 147 times
 PDF Downloaded : 95 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.