EVALUASI PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN PESANTREN MAHASISWA MODEL CIPP (CONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, PRODUCT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi.v6i1.848

Authors

  • Walid Fajar Antariksa Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Abdul Fattah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Mutiara Arlisyah Putri Utami Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Keywords:

Pesantren, Learning Evaluation, Islamic University

Abstract

Pesantren is an educational institution in Indonesia that focuses on developing the religious character of its students. Pesantren has developed into various types, one of which is student boarding schools. Pesantren as educational institutions need to evaluate their educational programs to measure the extent of their effectiveness in achieving goals. One of the methods that are often used in the evaluation is the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model. This study aims to evaluate the student boarding school education program with the CIPP model. The location of this research is at the Student Islamic Boarding School of UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. The method used is qualitative and quantitative. Data collection techniques using observations, interviews, documentation, and questionnaires. The results showed that the evaluation of the context aspect, in general, was effective, the evaluation of the input aspect was considered quite effective, the evaluation of the process aspect still needed to be improved, while the evaluation of the product aspect was considered to be lacking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safruddin Abdul Jabar. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bhakti, Y. B. (2017). Evaluasi Program Model CIPP pada Proses Pembelajaran IPA. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah), 1(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v1i2.109

Chotimah, Chusnul, and Khoirun Nisa’. (2020). “Pengembangan Kurikulum Pondok Pesantren.” INOVATIF: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Agama Dan Kebudayaan 6(1):45–68.

Chinta, R., Kebritchi, M., & Ellias, J. (2016). A conceptual framework for evaluating higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2015-0120

Izfanna, D., & Hisyam, N. A. (2012). A comprehensive approach in developing akhlaq: A case study on the implementation of character education at Pondok Pesantren Darunnajah. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 6(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/17504971211236254

Islam, Muhammad Hifdil, and Abd Aziz. (2020). Transformation of Pesantren in Maintaining Good Character. HUMANISTIKA : Jurnal Keislaman 6(1):35–48. doi: 10.36835/humanistika.v6i1.307.

Khuriyah, K., Zamroni, Z., & Sumarno, S. (2016). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Pengelolaan Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.7529

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. At-Ta’dib, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v6i1.551

Mufid, M. (2020). Evaluasi Model Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Program Baca Tulis Al-Qur’an di Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pekalongan. QUALITY, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21043/quality.v8i1.6908

Muyasaroh, M., & Sutrisno, S. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Cipp Pada Program Pembelajaran Tahfiz Al-Qur’an Di Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2862

Wirawan. (2011). Evaluasi Teori Model Standar Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tayibnapis, Farida Yusuf. (2008). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

EVALUASI PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN PESANTREN MAHASISWA MODEL CIPP (CONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, PRODUCT). (2022). Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi.v6i1.848

Similar Articles

1-10 of 54

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.