IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DRIVING SCHOOL (SEKOLAH PENGGERAK) AND DRIVING TEACHERS (GURU PENGGERAK) PROGRAM AS EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION IN THE SOCIETY 5.0 ERA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32478/leadership.v6i1.2696

Authors

  • Nor Rochmatul Wachidah UIN Raden Intan Lampung -  Indonesia
  • M. Luqmanul Hakim Habibie Institut Teknologi Sumatera -  Indonesia
  • Nur Syamsiah UIN Raden Intan Lampung -  Indonesia
  • Sri Purwanti Nasution UIN Raden Intan Lampung -  Indonesia

Abstract

In the Society 5.0 era, educational challenges have become increasingly complex, requiring innovations that support school transformation and the improvement of teacher quality. The Driving School Program and Driving Teachers Program are Indonesia's government responses to these needs. The School Empowerment Program aims to digitalize schools, strengthen governance, and create a more interactive and technology-adaptive learning environment. Meanwhile, the Teacher Empowerment Program focuses on human resource development through continuous training and study comparisons, aiming to enhance teachers' skills and competencies in facing the demands of the digital era. Teachers are expected to become agents of change capable of applying innovations within school environments, improving collaboration, and leading the educational transformation process. This research uses a literature review method, analyzing various relevant sources regarding the implementation of these two programs. The results show that these programs positively impact the improvement of teachers' competencies, particularly in mastering technology and teaching methodologies relevant to Society 5.0. Additionally, the implementation of the School Empowerment Program supports the role of schools in enhancing the quality of education through digitalization and innovation. Thus, the School Empowerment Program and Teacher Empowerment Program can be considered significant innovations in preparing Indonesia's young generation to compete in the continuously evolving digital era.

Keywords: Digitalization; Driving School; Driving Teachers; Education Innovation; Society 5.0.

 

Abstrak

Di era Society 5.0, tantangan pendidikan semakin kompleks, memerlukan inovasi yang mendukung transformasi sekolah dan peningkatan kualitas guru. Program Sekolah Penggerak dan Guru Penggerak merupakan respon pemerintah Indonesia terhadap kebutuhan ini. Program Sekolah Penggerak bertujuan untuk mendigitalisasi sekolah, memperkuat tata kelola, dan menciptakan lingkungan belajar yang lebih interaktif dan adaptif terhadap teknologi. Di sisi lain, Program Guru Penggerak berfokus pada pengembangan sumber daya manusia melalui pelatihan dan studi banding berkelanjutan, yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan dan kompetensi guru dalam menghadapi tuntutan era digital. Guru diharapkan menjadi agen perubahan yang mampu menerapkan inovasi di lingkungan sekolah, meningkatkan kolaborasi, serta memimpin dalam proses transformasi pendidikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi literatur, dengan menganalisis berbagai sumber yang relevan mengenai implementasi kedua program tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa program ini mampu memberikan dampak positif dalam peningkatan kompetensi guru, terutama dalam hal penguasaan teknologi dan metodologi pembelajaran yang relevan dengan Society 5.0. Selain itu, implementasi Program Sekolah Penggerak juga mendukung peran sekolah dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan melalui digitalisasi dan inovasi. Program Sekolah Penggerak dan Guru Penggerak dapat dianggap sebagai inovasi penting yang mempersiapkan generasi muda Indonesia untuk berkompetisi di era digital yang terus berkembang.

Kata Kunci: Digitalisasi; Guru Penggerak; Inovasi Pendidikan; Sekolah Penggerak; Society 5.0.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadin, A., Nehru, N., & Iqbal, M. (2023). Persiapan Guru Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Diera Society 5.0 Studi Kasus Para Guru Sekolah SMAN 1 Wawo. JUPEIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(3), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.57218/jupeis.Vol2.Iss3.770

Ahmed, H. N., Pasha, A. R., & Malik, M. (2021). The Role of Teacher Training Programs in Optimizing Teacher Motivation and Professional Development Skills. Bulletin of Education and Research, 43(2), 17-37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1338294

Ardiansyah, D., & Basuki, B. (2023). Implementasi nilai-nilai kesalehan sosial di pondok pesantren dalam menghadapi era society 5.0. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 1(2), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.60132/jip.v1i2.16

Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies, and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25, 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x

Detgen, A., Fernandez, F., McMahon, A., Johnson, L., & Dailey, C. R. (2021). Efficacy of a college and career readiness program: Bridge to employment. The Career development quarterly, 69(3), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12270

Dwikoryanto, M. I. T., Hendrilia, Y., & Anjaya, C. E. (2021). Sekolah Kristen dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen dalam Persiapan Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Regula Fidei: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 6(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.33541/rfidei.v6i2.102

Huda, M., & Hashim, A. (2022). Towards professional and ethical balance: Insights into application strategy on media literacy education. Kybernetes, 51(3), 1280-1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2017-0252

Husniati, R. ., Setiadi, I. K. ., Pangestuti, D. C. ., & Nugraheni, S. . (2022). TANTANGAN GURU DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PEMBELAJARAN DI ERA INDUSTRI 4.0 DAN SOCIETY 5.0. Batara Wisnu : Indonesian Journal of Community Services, 2(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.53363/bw.v2i1.79

Irawaty, I., Suran Ningsih, A., Prabowo, M. S. ., Setyasto, N. ., Wardani, N. W., Munawaroha, E. ., Hanuma, H. L. ., Farlina, I., Indriyani, W., & Lestari, E. . (2023). Program Sekolah Penggerak dan Peran Guru Penggerak Berdasarkan Kurikulum Merdeka Bagi Guru Yayasan Asshodiqiyah Kota Semarang: -. LOSARI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.53860/losari.v5i1.123

Korthagen, F., & Nuijten, E. (2022). The power of reflection in teacher education and professional development: Strategies for in-depth teacher learning. Routledge.

Lee, S., & Lee, K. (2024). Smart teachers in smart schools in a smart city: teachers as adaptive agents of educational technology reforms. Learning, media and technology, 49(3), 456-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2207143

Legi, H., Damanik, D., & Giban, Y. (2023). Transforming Education Through Technological Innovation In The Face Of The Era Of Society 5.0. Educenter : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.55904/educenter.v2i2.822

mira, A. nur sakiinah, alfi , alfi fadliya putri mahya, & Santoso, G. (2022). Revolusi Pendidikan di Era Society 5.0; Pembelajaran, Tantangan, Peluang, Akses, Dan Keterampilan Teknologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif, 1(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.9000/jpt.v1i2.508

Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of research methodology.

Mulang, H., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2023). Exploring the Implementation of Ethical and Spiritual Values in High School Education: A Case Study in Makassar, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 3(1), 01 - 13. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v3i1.105

Mustari, M. (2024). Transformasi Pendidikan di Era Sosiety 5.0 dalam Implementasi Sekolah Penggerak. Scientia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.51773/sssh.v3i2.302

Nurlaeli, Febriani, T., Syarifuddin, A., Hamzah, A., & Tastin. (2023). Creativity of Driving Teachers in Developing Learning Interests of Class V Elementary School Students. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 11(2), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v11i2.61615

Ramadhan, Y. M. (2024). Implementasi Pendidikan Guna Membangun Karakter Di Sekolah Pada Era 5.0. EDUCARE: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kesehatan, 1(2), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.37985/jedu.v1i2.3

Rianti, R., & Setiawan, A. (2024). Inovasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Di Era Society 5.0. Samarinda International Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.12345/sijis.v1i1.32 .

Santagata, R., König, J., Scheiner, T., Nguyen, H., Adleff, A. K., Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2021). Mathematics teacher learning to notice: A systematic review of studies of video-based programs. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01216-z

Sari, Y., Pitoewas, B., & Susilo, S. (2024). Pengaruh Peran Guru Penggerak Terhadap Pengembangan Kompetensi Sosial Guru di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Educare : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.56393/educare.v4i1.2022

Shanks, R., Attard Tonna, M., Krøjgaard, F., Paaske, K. A., Robson, D., & Bjerkholt, E. (2022). A comparative study of mentoring for new teachers. Professional Development in Education, 48(5), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1744684

Sung, Y. K., Lee, M., Seo, D. H., & others. (2022). Teacher agency and transformation at the crossroads of a diffused school change movement: An empirical typology of the Hyukshin Schools in South Korea. Journal of Educational Change, 23, 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09423-5

Syarnubi, S., Syarifuddin, A., & Sukirman, S. (2023). Curriculum Design for the Islamic Religious Education Study Program in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 6333-6341. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.3421

Thahery, R. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Dalam Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Technical and Vocational Education International Journal (TAVEIJ), 3(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.556442/taveij.v3i1.273

Downloads

Published

2024-12-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DRIVING SCHOOL (SEKOLAH PENGGERAK) AND DRIVING TEACHERS (GURU PENGGERAK) PROGRAM AS EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION IN THE SOCIETY 5.0 ERA (Nor Rochmatul Wachidah, M. L. H. . Habibie, Nur Syamsiah, & S. P. . Nasution , Trans.). (2024). Leadership: Jurnal Mahasiswa Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.32478/leadership.v6i1.2696