PENGGUNAAN POTENSI WILAYAH PERTANIAN SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR
(1) STAI Ma'had Aly Al-Hikam Malang
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal AL-MUDARRIS
Full Text: / Language : id
Submitted : 2018-09-24
Published : 2018-10-12
Observation result in class IV A Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Mafatihul Huda Pujon Malang, it is known that learning is still dominated by teachers using the lecture method. Based on the results of observation, students feel bored, unhappy, and less motivated by the lecture method. From the lack of student motivation, it has an impact on the low student learning outcomes. The purpose of this study is to produce learning media that can improve student learning outcomes through the application of agricultural potential areas using five stages, namely (1) Needs analysis, (2) Study of basic competencies and learning materials, (3) Development of learning programs, (4) Production learning media, (5) Trial / product revision of learning media. The results of this study indicate that the use of the potential of agricultural areas as a learning media for “Makananku Sehat dan Bergizi” subtheme in grade IV is very valid / feasible and student learning outcomes have increased. This is indicated by the test results (1) Media experts included in the assessment category are very valid / feasible with coefficient 0.96, (2) Learning design experts / teachers included in the assessment category are very valid / feasible with coefficient 0.92 (3) Small group trials included in the assessment category are very valid / feasible with coefficient 0.9. The learning outcomes of the student on the knowledge aspect increased from 45% in the pretest to 85% in the post test, the learning outcomes of the students on the attitudes increased from 65% in the pretest to 77% in the post test, and the learning outcomes of student on the skills increased from 64% in the pretest to 85% in the post test.
Anderson, L. W., dkk., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Longman, 2010.
Kemdikbud, Pendekatan Scientific (Ilmiah) dalam Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Pusbangprodik, 2013.
Mary Forehad, “Bloom’sTaxonomy: Original and Revised”, diakses dari http://sciencesite.16mb.com, pada tanggal 20 Agustus 2018 pukul 08.00
Maria Varelas dan Michael Ford, The Scientific Method and Scientific Inquiry: Tensions in Teaching and Learning, USA: Wiley InterScience, 2009.
Nana Sudjana, Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009.
Paul Suparno, Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Piaget, Yogyakarta : Kanisius, 2001.
Sivasailam Thiagarajan, dkk., Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Expectional Children, Minneapolis : Leadership Training Institute/Special Education University of Minnesota, 1974.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.
Sukanti, ”Penilaian Afektif dalam Pembelajaran Akuntansi” Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. IX Tahun 2011.
Tajularipin Sulaiman, dkk, “Implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching of Science : A Case Study in Malaysia” International Research Journal of Education and Sciense (Irjes) vol.1 Issue. 1 2017
Tennyson, R, D. “Historical reflection on learning theories and instructional design”, Contemporary Educational Technology, Vol.1.
Trianto, Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada, 2010.
Article MetricsAbstract Views : 194 times
PDF Downloaded : 95 times
- There are currently no refbacks.